BIS Innovation Hub
Nexus - Short ReportAbout the BIS Innovation Hub
  • Introduction
    • Nexus Overview
    • How to use this site
    • Overview Report
    • Terminology
  • Payment Setup
    • Key Points
    • Scope of Nexus payments
    • Steps 1-2: Country, Currency & Amount
    • Steps 3-6: Exchange Rates
    • Steps 7-9: Addressing, Proxy Resolution & Confirmation of Payee
    • Steps 10-11: Sanctions screening
    • Step 12: Ask the Sender for approval
    • Step 13-16: Set up and send the payment instruction
    • Step 17: Accept the confirmation and notify Sender
  • Addressing & Proxy Resolution
    • Key Points
    • Overview of Payment Addressing in Nexus
      • Addressing via Proxies (Aliases)
      • Addressing via Account Details
    • Address Types & Inputs
      • Address Types
      • Address Inputs
      • Financial Institution Identification
      • List of PSPs
      • Examples
    • Proxy & Account Resolution Process
      • Step 1: Sender inputs proxy or account details
      • Step 2: Proxy Resolution Messaging Sequence
      • Step 3: Account Resolution Messaging Sequence
      • Step 4: Source PSP processes the results
      • Masking of Display Names
    • Role of the Proxy Directory Operator (PDO)
      • Obligations on the Proxy Directory Operator
      • Obligations of PSPs using the Proxy Directory
      • Onboarding a Proxy Directory Operator onto Nexus
  • FX Provision
    • Key Points
    • Role of the FX Provider
    • How Third-Party FX provision works in Nexus
    • Joining Nexus as a third-party FXP
    • Accessing Instant Payment Systems
    • Onboarding PSPs
    • Obligations & Compliance
    • Revenue model for FXPs
    • Rates from Third-Party FX Providers
      • Improving rates for larger transactions
      • Improving rates for specific PSPs
    • Quotes
    • Managing Liquidity
  • Payment Processing
    • Key Points
    • Accounts & Relationships
    • Maximum value of a Nexus payment
    • Payment Flow (Happy Path)
      • Detailed Flow in Source Country (Sending)
      • Detailed Flow in Destination Country (Receiving)
      • Booking flow for Source PSPs
      • Notifying FXPs of completed payments
    • Validations, Duplicates & Fraud
    • Time critical vs non-time critical payments
    • Special Scenarios
    • Payment setup for PSPs who provide their own FX
    • Unsuccessful Payments (Exceptions)
      • Rejects
      • Recall Requests
      • Returns
      • Investigation & Enquiry
      • Disputes
      • Reconciliation reports
    • Fees
    • Role and responsibilities of the Instant Payment System Operator (IPSO)
    • Ensuring settlement certainty
    • Annex: 4-step vs 5-step Processes in Domestic Clearing and Settlement
    • Annex: Sponsoring PSPs and Sponsored Entities
  • Settlement Access Provision
    • Key Points
    • Role of the Settlement Access Provider (SAP)
    • Joining Nexus as an SAP
    • SAP onboarding of FXPs (or foreign PSPs)
    • Costs and Revenue for SAPs
    • Obligations on the SAP
    • Processing payments as an SAP
      • Payment Process for the Source SAP
      • Payment Process for the Destination SAP
      • How the Destination IPS initiates the payment via the Destination SAP
    • Managing Liquidity as an SAP
  • Messaging & Translation
    • Key Points
    • General Usage of ISO 20022
      • Adherence to CPMI Harmonised ISO 20022 Data Requirements
    • Compatibility with Instant Payments Plus (IP+)
    • Message transformation by Nexus
    • Specific Message Elements
    • Purpose Codes
    • Message Guidelines (Excel)
    • MESSAGE acmt.023 Identification Verification Request
    • MESSAGE acmt.024 Identification Verification Report
    • MESSAGE: pacs.008 FI to FI Customer Credit Transfer
      • pacs.008 Differences from CPMI Harmonisation Requirements
    • MESSAGE pacs.002 Payment Status Report
      • pacs.002 Differences from CPMI/CBPR+ Guidelines
    • MESSAGE: pacs.004 Payment Return (Not yet supported)
    • MESSAGE: camt.054 Bank to Customer Debit Credit Notification
    • Translation To/From Domestic Message Formats
    • Translating To/From ISO 20022 Codes
  • APIs
    • Overview
    • Countries
    • Currencies
    • Address Types and Inputs
    • Financial Institutions
    • Fees and Amounts
    • Intermediary Agents (SAPs)
    • Quotes
    • ISO 20022 Messages
  • About
    • Contact the Nexus Team
  • LEGAL
    • Terms and Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Notice
    • Cookies Notice
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Revenue earned by the SAP
  • Costs incurred by the SAP
Export as PDF
  1. Settlement Access Provision

Costs and Revenue for SAPs

Revenue earned by the SAP

In principle, the SAP acts as a service provider to the FXP, by facilitating access to the IPS for that FXP. The commercial relationship between the SAP and the FXP sits outside of the scope of the Nexus Scheme and the specific pricing arrangements are to be arranged bilaterally between the FXP and SAP. However, note that the Nexus Scheme does set the following requirements:

  • The SAP is permitted to charge the FXP for the service it provides. For example, this could include a fixed periodic fee for the provisioning of the account, and/or a per-transaction fee for the transactions settled by the SAP on behalf of the FXP. These charges are agreed bilaterally between the SAP and FXP.

  • The SAP may choose to supply the FXP with liquidity in the form of a line of credit, for a charge.

The SAP must not deduct fees from the value of the payment transferred:

  • When acting as the Source SAP, the Source SAP must credit the FXP’s account with the exact amount that it received from the Source PSP

  • When acting as the Destination SAP, it must debit the FXP’s account by the exact amount specified in the Interbank Settlement Amount in the payment instruction, and transfer that amount in full to the Destination PSP

  • Any fees charged by the SAP to the FXP must therefore be charged separately and paid by the FXP to the SAP outside of the Nexus scheme.

Costs incurred by the SAP

  • The SAP will have to pay the fees as levied by the domestic IPS for the processing. These fees are set by the IPS and are not defined or standardised in the Nexus Scheme Rulebook.

    • In most (but not all) IPSs, only the institution that initiates the payment pays a fee. This means that typically the Destination SAP will pay a fee to the Destination IPS, but the Source SAP will not pay a fee to the Source IPS.

  • The SAP will need to apply sanction screening to payments it processes on behalf of the FXP (if required to do so by domestic regulations).

The SAP will need to include these costs in its fees towards the FXP (although some of these costs, such as IPS membership fees, can potentially be shared across other payment services, such as domestic payments).

PreviousSAP onboarding of FXPs (or foreign PSPs)NextObligations on the SAP

Last updated 7 months ago