BIS Innovation Hub
Nexus - Short ReportAbout the BIS Innovation Hub
  • Introduction
    • Nexus Overview
    • How to use this site
    • Overview Report
    • Terminology
  • Payment Setup
    • Key Points
    • Scope of Nexus payments
    • Steps 1-2: Country, Currency & Amount
    • Steps 3-6: Exchange Rates
    • Steps 7-9: Addressing, Proxy Resolution & Confirmation of Payee
    • Steps 10-11: Sanctions screening
    • Step 12: Ask the Sender for approval
    • Step 13-16: Set up and send the payment instruction
    • Step 17: Accept the confirmation and notify Sender
  • Addressing & Proxy Resolution
    • Key Points
    • Overview of Payment Addressing in Nexus
      • Addressing via Proxies (Aliases)
      • Addressing via Account Details
    • Address Types & Inputs
      • Address Types
      • Address Inputs
      • Financial Institution Identification
      • List of PSPs
      • Examples
    • Proxy & Account Resolution Process
      • Step 1: Sender inputs proxy or account details
      • Step 2: Proxy Resolution Messaging Sequence
      • Step 3: Account Resolution Messaging Sequence
      • Step 4: Source PSP processes the results
      • Masking of Display Names
    • Role of the Proxy Directory Operator (PDO)
      • Obligations on the Proxy Directory Operator
      • Obligations of PSPs using the Proxy Directory
      • Onboarding a Proxy Directory Operator onto Nexus
  • FX Provision
    • Key Points
    • Role of the FX Provider
    • How Third-Party FX provision works in Nexus
    • Joining Nexus as a third-party FXP
    • Accessing Instant Payment Systems
    • Onboarding PSPs
    • Obligations & Compliance
    • Revenue model for FXPs
    • Rates from Third-Party FX Providers
      • Improving rates for larger transactions
      • Improving rates for specific PSPs
    • Quotes
    • Managing Liquidity
  • Payment Processing
    • Key Points
    • Accounts & Relationships
    • Maximum value of a Nexus payment
    • Payment Flow (Happy Path)
      • Detailed Flow in Source Country (Sending)
      • Detailed Flow in Destination Country (Receiving)
      • Booking flow for Source PSPs
      • Notifying FXPs of completed payments
    • Validations, Duplicates & Fraud
    • Time critical vs non-time critical payments
    • Special Scenarios
    • Payment setup for PSPs who provide their own FX
    • Unsuccessful Payments (Exceptions)
      • Rejects
      • Recall Requests
      • Returns
      • Investigation & Enquiry
      • Disputes
      • Reconciliation reports
    • Fees
    • Role and responsibilities of the Instant Payment System Operator (IPSO)
    • Ensuring settlement certainty
    • Annex: 4-step vs 5-step Processes in Domestic Clearing and Settlement
    • Annex: Sponsoring PSPs and Sponsored Entities
  • Settlement Access Provision
    • Key Points
    • Role of the Settlement Access Provider (SAP)
    • Joining Nexus as an SAP
    • SAP onboarding of FXPs (or foreign PSPs)
    • Costs and Revenue for SAPs
    • Obligations on the SAP
    • Processing payments as an SAP
      • Payment Process for the Source SAP
      • Payment Process for the Destination SAP
      • How the Destination IPS initiates the payment via the Destination SAP
    • Managing Liquidity as an SAP
  • Messaging & Translation
    • Key Points
    • General Usage of ISO 20022
      • Adherence to CPMI Harmonised ISO 20022 Data Requirements
    • Compatibility with Instant Payments Plus (IP+)
    • Message transformation by Nexus
    • Specific Message Elements
    • Purpose Codes
    • Message Guidelines (Excel)
    • MESSAGE acmt.023 Identification Verification Request
    • MESSAGE acmt.024 Identification Verification Report
    • MESSAGE: pacs.008 FI to FI Customer Credit Transfer
      • pacs.008 Differences from CPMI Harmonisation Requirements
    • MESSAGE pacs.002 Payment Status Report
      • pacs.002 Differences from CPMI/CBPR+ Guidelines
    • MESSAGE: pacs.004 Payment Return (Not yet supported)
    • MESSAGE: camt.054 Bank to Customer Debit Credit Notification
    • Translation To/From Domestic Message Formats
    • Translating To/From ISO 20022 Codes
  • APIs
    • Overview
    • Countries
    • Currencies
    • Address Types and Inputs
    • Financial Institutions
    • Fees and Amounts
    • Intermediary Agents (SAPs)
    • Quotes
    • ISO 20022 Messages
  • About
    • Contact the Nexus Team
  • LEGAL
    • Terms and Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Notice
    • Cookies Notice
Powered by GitBook
On this page
Export as PDF
  1. Payment Processing

Ensuring settlement certainty

PreviousRole and responsibilities of the Instant Payment System Operator (IPSO)NextAnnex: 4-step vs 5-step Processes in Domestic Clearing and Settlement

Last updated 8 months ago

Within the Nexus payment flow, a payment is cleared and settled in both Source IPS and the Destination IPS sequentially and independently.

Nexus allows a payment to flow through IPS with any combination of domestic settlement models, including deferred net settlement or real time gross settlement. The Source IPS and Destination IPS can have different settlement models and different settlement times.

Ensuring settlement certainty

Each IPSO must ensure that any transaction committed to the Nexus Gateway will be honoured in all scenarios (including a default of an involved participant).

For each specific Nexus payment:

  • the Source IPS must ensure settlement between the Source PSP and Source SAP can be performed before sending a pacs.008 payment instruction to the Nexus gateway.

  • the Destination IPS must ensure settlement between the Destination SAP and Destination PSP can be performed before sending a positive pacs.002 payment status report to the Nexus Gateway. This includes any scenario, including (for example) a default of the Destination SAP or Destination PSP.

The mechanism to meet these requirements is up to the IPSO; Nexus does not prescribe a specific model or mechanism. Settlement certainty can be achieved for example by:

  • settling the transaction domestically before sending the transaction to Nexus (the ),

  • ensuring irrevocability in the system and relying on prefunding by participants, or

  • relying on a loss sharing agreement between participants.

In the case where a payment fails (whether as a result of a decision by the Source SAP, Nexus, Destination SAP, Destination IPS or the Destination PSP):

  • The Source IPS must ensure that, in the case the transaction is rejected by the Destination IPS (including by the Destination SAP or Destination PSP), the Source IPS is able to process the reject and reverse any transfer between the Source PSP and Source SAP.

  • The Source IPS must ensure the reject will be processed, even in the case of a default or lack of funds at the Source SAP. This is particularly relevant in the scenario where the Source IPS uses a 4-step settlement model and the funds have already been transferred from the Source PSP to the Source SAP.

In Nexus transactions, the resulting consequences and obligations from these settlement certainty requirements are documented in the table below.

Consequences and obligations

4-step settlement in Destination IPS

  • Source IPS must ensure rejects can be handled correctly

  • Destination IPS must ensure transactions cannot be rejected by D-SAP or D-PSP after the payment confirmation has been given to the Nexus Gateway

  • Source IPS must ensure settlement is guaranteed before sending the payment instruction to the Nexus Gateway

  • Destination IPS must ensure transactions cannot be rejected by D-SAP or D-PSP after confirmation has been given to the Nexus Gateway

5-step settlement in Destination IPS

  • Source IPS must ensure rejects can be handled correctly

  • Destination IPS confirms to the Nexus Gateway after successful settlement in its system (after confirmation of the Destination PSP)

  • Source IPS must ensure settlement is guaranteed before sending the transaction to the Nexus Gateway

  • Destination IPS confirms to the Nexus Gateway after successful settlement in its system (after confirmation of the Destination PSP)

in Source IPS

in Source IPS

4-step settlement model
4-step settlement
5-step settlement