BIS Innovation Hub
Nexus - Short ReportAbout the BIS Innovation Hub
  • Introduction
    • Nexus Overview
    • How to use this site
    • Overview Report
    • Terminology
  • Payment Setup
    • Key Points
    • Scope of Nexus payments
    • Steps 1-2: Country, Currency & Amount
    • Steps 3-6: Exchange Rates
    • Steps 7-9: Addressing, Proxy Resolution & Confirmation of Payee
    • Steps 10-11: Sanctions screening
    • Step 12: Ask the Sender for approval
    • Step 13-16: Set up and send the payment instruction
    • Step 17: Accept the confirmation and notify Sender
  • Addressing & Proxy Resolution
    • Key Points
    • Overview of Payment Addressing in Nexus
      • Addressing via Proxies (Aliases)
      • Addressing via Account Details
    • Address Types & Inputs
      • Address Types
      • Address Inputs
      • Financial Institution Identification
      • List of PSPs
      • Examples
    • Proxy & Account Resolution Process
      • Step 1: Sender inputs proxy or account details
      • Step 2: Proxy Resolution Messaging Sequence
      • Step 3: Account Resolution Messaging Sequence
      • Step 4: Source PSP processes the results
      • Masking of Display Names
    • Role of the Proxy Directory Operator (PDO)
      • Obligations on the Proxy Directory Operator
      • Obligations of PSPs using the Proxy Directory
      • Onboarding a Proxy Directory Operator onto Nexus
  • FX Provision
    • Key Points
    • Role of the FX Provider
    • How Third-Party FX provision works in Nexus
    • Joining Nexus as a third-party FXP
    • Accessing Instant Payment Systems
    • Onboarding PSPs
    • Obligations & Compliance
    • Revenue model for FXPs
    • Rates from Third-Party FX Providers
      • Improving rates for larger transactions
      • Improving rates for specific PSPs
    • Quotes
    • Managing Liquidity
  • Payment Processing
    • Key Points
    • Accounts & Relationships
    • Maximum value of a Nexus payment
    • Payment Flow (Happy Path)
      • Detailed Flow in Source Country (Sending)
      • Detailed Flow in Destination Country (Receiving)
      • Booking flow for Source PSPs
      • Notifying FXPs of completed payments
    • Validations, Duplicates & Fraud
    • Time critical vs non-time critical payments
    • Special Scenarios
    • Payment setup for PSPs who provide their own FX
    • Unsuccessful Payments (Exceptions)
      • Rejects
      • Recall Requests
      • Returns
      • Investigation & Enquiry
      • Disputes
      • Reconciliation reports
    • Fees
    • Role and responsibilities of the Instant Payment System Operator (IPSO)
    • Ensuring settlement certainty
    • Annex: 4-step vs 5-step Processes in Domestic Clearing and Settlement
    • Annex: Sponsoring PSPs and Sponsored Entities
  • Settlement Access Provision
    • Key Points
    • Role of the Settlement Access Provider (SAP)
    • Joining Nexus as an SAP
    • SAP onboarding of FXPs (or foreign PSPs)
    • Costs and Revenue for SAPs
    • Obligations on the SAP
    • Processing payments as an SAP
      • Payment Process for the Source SAP
      • Payment Process for the Destination SAP
      • How the Destination IPS initiates the payment via the Destination SAP
    • Managing Liquidity as an SAP
  • Messaging & Translation
    • Key Points
    • General Usage of ISO 20022
      • Adherence to CPMI Harmonised ISO 20022 Data Requirements
    • Compatibility with Instant Payments Plus (IP+)
    • Message transformation by Nexus
    • Specific Message Elements
    • Purpose Codes
    • Message Guidelines (Excel)
    • MESSAGE acmt.023 Identification Verification Request
    • MESSAGE acmt.024 Identification Verification Report
    • MESSAGE: pacs.008 FI to FI Customer Credit Transfer
      • pacs.008 Differences from CPMI Harmonisation Requirements
    • MESSAGE pacs.002 Payment Status Report
      • pacs.002 Differences from CPMI/CBPR+ Guidelines
    • MESSAGE: pacs.004 Payment Return (Not yet supported)
    • MESSAGE: camt.054 Bank to Customer Debit Credit Notification
    • Translation To/From Domestic Message Formats
    • Translating To/From ISO 20022 Codes
  • APIs
    • Overview
    • Countries
    • Currencies
    • Address Types and Inputs
    • Financial Institutions
    • Fees and Amounts
    • Intermediary Agents (SAPs)
    • Quotes
    • ISO 20022 Messages
  • About
    • Contact the Nexus Team
  • LEGAL
    • Terms and Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Notice
    • Cookies Notice
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Financial institution identification
  • Message and instruction identification
Export as PDF
  1. Messaging & Translation

Specific Message Elements

Financial institution identification

Any financial institution in Nexus, including PSPs, SAPs (and FXPs), can be identified using either BIC, LEI, or an alternative domestic format (“Clearing System Member Id” in the ISO 20022 standard).

  • In case the BIC is used to identify financial institutions (Agents in the ISO 20022 standards), this may be either BIC-11 or BIC-8.

  • The Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) is a 20-character, alpha-numeric code based on the ISO 17442 standard developed by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO).

    • The Source PSP should provide its own LEI in the <LEI> element. (This can help to streamline sanctions screening.)

    • Where LEIs for other agents are available, they can also be used (but are not mandatory).

  • Clearing System Member Ids need to follow the domestic formatting rules.

  • The format of domestic Clearing System Member IDs should be defined by the IPSO (when onboarding with Nexus, using the Nexus Service Desk), as a regular expression, so that it can be shared with Source PSPs when initiating payments to the Destination Country. See Financial Institution Identification.

Retrieving reachable PSPs: Nexus provides the IPSO with the GET PSPs API, allowing for the retrieval of all reachable and non-reachable parties in a specific country. This API will also return additional information on the reachable parties, such as the supported services (for example the support for time critical and non-time critical Nexus payments).

Message and instruction identification

Nexus prescribes two specific reference elements for track & trace purposes across the Nexus network:

Message ID

The message ID in the ISO 20022 XML messages serves as a point-to-point reference and will be assigned by the sending party in each message leg. The message ID should be generated according to the Nexus Usage Guidelines. This message ID must be unique per sending party for at least 2 months and is assigned in the Group Header > Message Identification element.

Unique End-to-end Transaction Reference (UETR)

The UETR is the unique end-to-end transaction reference element, generated according to the Universally Unique Identifier (UUID) algorithm defined in IETF standard RFC 4122, using version 4 of the generation algorithm. The algorithm ensures that no two payments will have the same ID, without the generating party needing to check against a central database to see if an ID is already in use.

  • It is highly recommended that the UETR should be generated and assigned by the Source PSP, so that there is full end-to-end traceability of this payment using the UETR.

  • However, if the domestic format does not cater for UETR, the Source IPS must generate a UETR upon translating a domestic-format payment instruction into the Nexus pacs.008. The IPS must be able to correlate the generated UETR back to the payment instruction received from the Source PSP.

  • The UETR must be carried unaltered throughout the payment life cycle. The UETR must be included in each transaction according to the Nexus Usage Guidelines.

  • The same UETR must be included in any pacs.002 reject or confirmation messages sent in response to the pacs.008, and any subsequent return messages that need to reference the original pacs.008.

Other Reference Elements

Other reference elements must be transported unaltered in accordance with the Nexus Usage Guidelines:

  • Instruction ID (in Credit Transfer Transaction Information)

    • The instruction identification is a point-to-point reference that can be used between the instructing party and the instructed party to refer to the individual instruction. It can be included in several messages related to the instruction. In accordance with the CPMI ISO 20022 harmonisation requirements, this is not required in Nexus (despite being mandatory in CBPR+).

  • End-to-End ID (in Credit Transfer Transaction Information)

    • Unique identification, as assigned by the initiating party, to unambiguously identify the transaction. If provided, this identification must be passed on, unchanged, throughout the entire end-to-end chain.

  • Transaction ID (in Credit Transfer Transaction Information)

    • Unique identification, as assigned by the first instructing agent, to unambiguously identify the transaction. If provided, this identification must be passed on, unchanged, throughout the entire interbank chain.

  • Clearing System Reference (in Credit Transfer Transaction Information)

    • Unique reference, as assigned by a clearing system, to unambiguously identify the instruction. If provided, this identification must be passed on, unchanged, throughout the entire interbank chain.

PreviousMessage transformation by NexusNextPurpose Codes

Last updated 8 months ago